iFi Zen DAC 3 vs Loxjie A30

Short answer

  • More power: the iFi Zen DAC 3, with 210 mW into 32 Ω; the Loxjie A30 has 100 mW. The iFi Zen DAC 3 drives 4 headphones to 100 dB that the Loxjie A30 cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, Symphonium Helios, 1 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the iFi Zen DAC 3 costs $59 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $229 against $170.

The iFi Zen DAC 3 reaches 100 dB on 564 of the 567 models here, the Loxjie A30 on 560.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationiFi Zen DAC 3Loxjie A30
Power into 32Ω210 mW100 mW
Power into 150Ω50 mW21 mW
Power into 300Ω28 mW11 mW
Power into 600Ω18 mW5.3 mW
Output impedance1 Ωnot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$229$170
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
564560

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancediFi Zen DAC 3Loxjie A30
Socket4.4mmno separate rating
Power into 32Ω300 mW—
Power into 300Ω106 mW derived—
Output impedance1 Ω—
Output noisenot published—
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565—

Only the iFi Zen DAC 3 has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 565 of the 567 models here. The Loxjie A30 may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadiFi Zen DAC 3Loxjie A30
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩPublishedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. iFi Zen DAC 3 publishes at 32 Ω and at 600 Ω; Loxjie A30 at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 600 Ω only the iFi Zen DAC 3 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

4 headphones reach 100 dB on the iFi Zen DAC 3 but not on the Loxjie A30 — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, Symphonium Helios, 1 more.

560 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Audio-Technica ATH-R70X: iFi Zen DAC 3 has +11 dB of headroom there against +6 dB. 5 dB is about 3.1 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for iFi Zen DAC 3 and Loxjie A30 because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsiFi Zen DAC 3 headroomLoxjie A30 headroomiFi Zen DAC 3 hissLoxjie A30 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+32 dB+28 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+12 dB+8 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+21 dB+18 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+17 dB+13 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+13 dB+10 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+11 dB+6 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+6 dB+2 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+4 dB+0 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The iFi Zen DAC 3 costs $59 more than the Loxjie A30. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 4 more models driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: iFi Zen DAC 3 and Loxjie A30.

↑