iFi Zen DAC 3 vs SMSL C200

Short answer

  • More power: the SMSL C200, with 1.30 W into 32 Ω; the iFi Zen DAC 3 has 210 mW. The SMSL C200 drives 3 headphones to 100 dB that the iFi Zen DAC 3 cannot (Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Crimson, Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the SMSL C200 costs $10 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the iFi Zen DAC 3 shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $229 against $219.

The SMSL C200 reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the iFi Zen DAC 3 on 564.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationiFi Zen DAC 3SMSL C200
Power into 32Ω210 mW1.3 W
Power into 150Ω50 mW277 mW
Power into 300Ω28 mW139 mW
Power into 600Ω18 mW69 mW
Output impedance1 Ωnot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$229$219
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
564567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancediFi Zen DAC 3SMSL C200
Socket4.4mmno separate rating
Power into 32Ω300 mW—
Power into 300Ω106 mW derived—
Output impedance1 Ω—
Output noisenot published—
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565—

Only the iFi Zen DAC 3 has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 565 of the 567 models here. The SMSL C200 may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadiFi Zen DAC 3SMSL C200
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩPublishedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. iFi Zen DAC 3 publishes at 32 Ω and at 600 Ω; SMSL C200 at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 600 Ω only the iFi Zen DAC 3 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

3 headphones reach 100 dB on the SMSL C200 but not on the iFi Zen DAC 3 — Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Crimson, Symphonium Titan.

564 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020: SMSL C200 has +26 dB of headroom there against +12 dB. 14 dB is about 25 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for iFi Zen DAC 3 and SMSL C200 because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsiFi Zen DAC 3 headroomSMSL C200 headroomiFi Zen DAC 3 hissSMSL C200 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+32 dB+46 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+12 dB+26 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+21 dB+29 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+17 dB+24 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+13 dB+23 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+11 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+6 dB+13 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+4 dB+11 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The iFi Zen DAC 3 costs $10 more than the SMSL C200, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the iFi Zen DAC 3 handles and the SMSL C200 does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper SMSL C200 drives 3 models to 100 dB that the iFi Zen DAC 3 does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: iFi Zen DAC 3 and SMSL C200.

↑