Both are portable players, $1200 against $1249. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?
The Shanling M7 reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here, the Lotoo PAW 6000 on 565.
| Specification | Lotoo PAW 6000 | Shanling M7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power into 32Ω | 300 mW | 406 mW |
| Power into 150Ω | 64 mW | 87 mW |
| Power into 300Ω | 32 mW | 43 mW |
| Power into 600Ω | 16 mW | 22 mW |
| Output impedance | not published | 1.0 Ω |
| Output noise | 0.975 µV | 1.6 µV |
| Price | $1200 | $1249 |
| Headphones it reaches 100 dB on out of 567 | 565 | 566 |
A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.
1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the Shanling M7 but not on the Lotoo PAW 6000 — Moondrop PARA.
1 headphone stays below the audible-hiss threshold on the Lotoo PAW 6000 but crosses it on the Shanling M7 (Tanchjim EA FORCE).
565 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.
Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: Lotoo PAW 6000 and Shanling M7. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.