Both are audio interfaces, $1399 against $899. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?
The RME ADI-2 DAC FS reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the RME Babyface Pro FS on 565.
| Specification | RME ADI-2 DAC FS | RME Babyface Pro FS |
|---|---|---|
| Power into 32Ω | 1.2 W | 374 mW |
| Power into 150Ω | 256 mW | 80 mW |
| Power into 300Ω | 128 mW | 40 mW |
| Power into 600Ω | 64 mW | 20 mW |
| Output impedance | 0.1 Ω | 10 Ω |
| Output noise | not published | 6.3 µV |
| Price | $1399 | $899 |
| Headphones it reaches 100 dB on out of 567 | 567 | 565 |
A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.
2 headphones reach 100 dB on the RME ADI-2 DAC FS but not on the RME Babyface Pro FS — Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Titan.
510 headphones are left alone by the RME ADI-2 DAC FS under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the RME Babyface Pro FS (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Nio, 507 more).
565 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.
Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: RME ADI-2 DAC FS and RME Babyface Pro FS. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.