RME ADI-2 DAC FS vs RME Babyface Pro FS

Short answer

  • More power: the RME ADI-2 DAC FS, with 1.20 W into 32 Ω; the RME Babyface Pro FS has 374 mW. The RME ADI-2 DAC FS drives 2 headphones to 100 dB that the RME Babyface Pro FS cannot (Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Titan).
  • Quieter with sensitive IEMs: the RME ADI-2 DAC FS. 93 headphones stay below audible hiss on it but not on the RME Babyface Pro FS (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio U12t, 64 Audio U18s, 90 more).
  • Output impedance: 510 headphones are left alone by the RME ADI-2 DAC FS under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the RME Babyface Pro FS (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Nio, 507 more).
  • Price: the RME ADI-2 DAC FS costs $500 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are audio interfaces, $1399 against $899.

The RME ADI-2 DAC FS reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the RME Babyface Pro FS on 565.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationRME ADI-2 DAC FSRME Babyface Pro FS
Power into 32Ω1.2 W374 mW
Power into 150Ω256 mW80 mW
Power into 300Ω128 mW40 mW
Power into 600Ω64 mW20 mW
Output impedance0.1 Ω10 Ω
Output noise2.18 µV6.3 µV
Price$1399$899
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567565

Where each power figure comes from

LoadRME ADI-2 DAC FSRME Babyface Pro FS
32 ΩPublishedUpper bound
150 ΩDerivedUpper bound
300 ΩDerivedUpper bound
600 ΩDerivedUpper bound

These two columns are not the same kind of number, and that matters more than the gap between them. RME ADI-2 DAC FS publishes a power rating (at 32 Ω); RME Babyface Pro FS publishes no power figure at any load, only a maximum output voltage, so every milliwatt in its column is a ceiling worked out from that voltage.

A ceiling assumes the amplifier holds that voltage into the load, and nothing on RME Babyface Pro FS’s own sheet says it does. It is the most flattering reading available, and it is used here only because the alternative is a blank. Where the RME Babyface Pro FS column looks the stronger of the two, treat the difference as unproven rather than measured. 24 of the 280 sources here are in that position, with no published power rating at any load.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

2 headphones reach 100 dB on the RME ADI-2 DAC FS but not on the RME Babyface Pro FS — Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Titan.

510 headphones are left alone by the RME ADI-2 DAC FS under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the RME Babyface Pro FS (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Nio, 507 more).

93 headphones stay below the audible-hiss threshold on the RME ADI-2 DAC FS but cross it on the RME Babyface Pro FS (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio U12t, 64 Audio U18s, 90 more).

565 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: RME ADI-2 DAC FS has +41 dB of headroom there against +34 dB. 7 dB is about 5 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

Hiss below about 20 dB SPL is inaudible in a quiet room.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsRME ADI-2 DAC FS headroomRME Babyface Pro FS headroomRME ADI-2 DAC FS hissRME Babyface Pro FS hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+41 dB+34 dB damping21 dB30 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+21 dB+14 dB damping1 dB10 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+28 dB+23 dB damping-1 dB9 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+24 dB+19 dB-5 dB4 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+21 dB+16 dB damping-6 dB3 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+17 dB+12 dB-12 dB-3 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+13 dB+8 dB-16 dB-7 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+11 dB+6 dB damping-18 dB-9 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The RME ADI-2 DAC FS costs $500 more than the RME Babyface Pro FS. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 2 more models driven to 100 dB, 510 more models left alone under the one-eighth rule and 93 more models kept below the audible-hiss threshold.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑